FREE Resources

KNOWLEDGE alone will not make your environment better and knowledge without action will not make you better.

We can HELP you when you're ready to take action, but first please be aware of the science, the evidence and the enormity of miss-information we have to solve. When Telco's and authorities tell you there is no evidence of harm, you have to question what they consider harm to be and who they wish to please.

This list of resources is tiny compared to what is available, but we think information can get overwhelming when you have too much science to wade through so we've selected some of the best resources to build your brainpower.

The problem we have is the transfer of this knowledge into solutions. That is yet to happen from Government or from our Regulatory bodies.

For that reason we believe we must be aware of the dangers first and foremost and then we must be willing to change our minds, our environment, our choices and our actions.


ARPANSA is the Australian Government's primary authority on radiation protection and nuclear safety. You have to ask WHO they are protecting?

Summary of ARPANSA (The Australian Radiation Protection And Nuclear Safety Agency) Standards by Professor Martin Pall: prof_martin_pall_inadequacy of safety guidelines

The Oceania Radiofrequency Advisory Associatin Inc. (ORSAA) was formed in 2015 by a group of academics and researchers throughout Australia because of their concern for public health. The radio frequency standards set by APARNSA and IRCNIRP ignore the independent science and rely solely on the science provided by the telecommunications industry and those that have a vested interest in keeping the existing standards.

In June 2020 ORSAA sent a submission to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in Washington DC USA, documenting their concern for the disregard of the health effects caused by electromagnetic radiation also known as microwave radiation.

Submission link:

The Precautionary Principle and EMF: The precautionary principle and EMF_ implementation and evaluation_Leeka et al 2000

Planetary electromagnetic pollution: is it time to assess its impact? Whitepaper by Pria Bandara & David Carpenter ORSAA

Arthur Firstenberg, founder of the Cellphone Taskforce: CELL PHONES: Q & A; How much radiation does a cell phone emit, compared to what exists in nature? CELL PHONES Q&A

FREE eBook:

Survival of the Smartest Survival of the Smartest eBook 2020


World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review): Hardel, L. 2017. Review.

Findings in Autism (ASD) Consistent with Electromagnetic  Fields (EMF) and Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR): Herbert et al 2012_BioInitiative Report Section 20

Radiations and male fertility: Kesari et al 2018

Brain Tumours: Rise in Glioblastoma Multiforme Incidence in England 1995-2015 Suggests an Adverse Environmental or Lifestyle Factor: Philips et al 2018

A Brochure by the Competence Initiative for the Protection of Humanity, Environment and Democracy: Birds Bees and Mankind_Destroying Nature by 'Electrosmog'_Effects of Wireless Communication Technologies

Prof. Martin Pall: 5G Great Risk by Martin Pall 2018

The BioInitiative Report - A report produced by 29 Scientists in ten countries on A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF):


Environmental Health Trust:

Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association:

Cell Phone Task Force - A website created by Arthur Firstenberg to Education, Advocacy and Support for Electrically Sensitive People:

International Appeal - Stop 5G on Earth and in Space:

Electrosensitivity UK - For people sensitised by electromagnetic fields and radiation: